If you’re a long-term trend follower, this is exactly the kind of move you like to see. A trend gets started in one month and – despite a few hiccups along the way – keeps moving lower and lower over the next 5 months, giving you time to get short…
Disclaimer: past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.
And then one day:
Disclaimer: past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.
A drop of more than $80 in a single day is huge… Every 1$ move in the price of an ounce of gold is a $100 change in the value of a gold contract. Anyone who stayed in a long gold position through it all is down $8490 per contract as of this writing (Disclaimer: past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results). And to think, it was just two days ago that Goldman Sachs recommended going short gold. In the annals of timely calls, that was a pretty impressive one. The online commentariat has been discussing this move at length, from the gloating naysayers to the chorus of gold bugs gnashing their teeth in frustration.
We don’t tend to get too deeply involved in that argument here. Managed futures isn’t a place where someone can get very far trying to argue over what gold should or shouldn’t do. Ritholtz posted a pair of great quips regarding gold today:
“Gold is a commodity, not a currency.”
And
“Gold is a trade, not a religion.”
We couldn’t agree more. And some of the CTAs we track are following that advice – Covenant Capital Aggressive has been short for months, and Quest Partners Original was short ahead of today’s move as well. We’ll see how much further gold has to fall, but those CTAs – and anyone who took Goldman’s advice earlier this week – are certainly smiling today.
















Ignoring the Biggest CTA Trade in Years
Several news organizations couldn’t help but fall all over themselves this week talking about how George Soros made a billion in the Yen and other U.S. Funds Scored Big in the Yen. We hope this isn’t the contrarian indicator that kills the trade, as the Yen is on a historic slide – new Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has been following through on his initial efforts to devalue Japan’s currency. Not even the hullaballoo over the G7’s criticism earlier this week was able to elicit more than a temporary hiccup in the trend:
Disclaimer: past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.
With a big move like this, there are always going to be plenty of people making money (and many who are losing money). But when the press started pointing out the big winners this week, we couldn’t help but notice a glaring omission: no mention of CTAs. We know that quite a few CTAs have made (or are currently making) money on short Yen trades, including Covenant Capital Management Aggressive, Briarwood Capital Management Diversified, Mark J. Walsh & Co. Standard, and Integrated Managed Futures Corp. Global Concentrated. (Disclaimer: past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results).
One of the best trades for managed futures in years, and not even a mention in mainstream coverage about it? Well, Bridgewater gets a mention toward the end of the WSJ article, but no one seems able to decide whether they’re a hedge fund or a CTA (for our money, they’re the former, though BarclayHedge counts them as a CTA). Just another day in our industry, and a reminder of why the lack of hedge fund/CTA distinction in the media rubs us the wrong way.