Commodity “Supercycle” Over?

The Wall Street Journal is out with a piece today claiming “Investors, Analysts See End of Commodity ‘Supercycle’:

“Institutions and individuals have poured more than $440 billion since 2004 into index funds and exchange-traded funds tracking broad commodity indexes, according to Barclays  That dwarfs the net flow of $25 billion into U.S. stock funds over the same period, according to Morningstar.

Commodity prices as a group nearly doubled between 1998 and 2008 as measured by the Dow Jones-USB Commodity Index, with some index components such as oil and gold rising as much as sevenfold during that time and leading to talk of a commodities “supercycle” among analysts and strategists.

“The {Dow Jones-UBS Commodity Index} slid 10.5% in the first half of the year, with raw materials dearest to China’s growth—industrial metals such as copper, aluminum and nickel—posting declines of as much as 20%.”

Charts Courtesy: WSJ

(Disclaimer: past performance is not necessarily indicative to future results.)

Our thoughts:

  • This looks like a classic contrarian signal, those calling for the end, bottom, top, beginning of anything are usually dead wrong
  • Commodities are notorious for volatile short term swings and longer term boom and bust cycles – what did these investors think they were getting into? Safe mortgage backed securities?
  • Whether you believe the commodity “supercycle” is over or not – commodity ETF’s are a bad choice, with large roll yield problems (see our piece here.)
  • Where will that $400 Billion+ go to find a new home?  Please don’t say stocks. Just because your diversification choice was the wrong one, doesn’t mean your choice to diversify was a poor one. Investors would be better served in our opinion seeking commodity diversification via ‘tactical commodity’ exposure, not dumb long only exposure.
  • Managed futures as a whole likely wouldn’t mind the “supercycle” ending with a bang (large, outlier type trends lower) instead of a wimper (choppy, sideways sliding lower)
  • Will more markets go into backwardation, with future prices expected to be lower?  If so, the commodity ETF roll yield problem becomes a tail wind.


What’s your take? Is the commodity “supercycle” over?  Was it ever here? What does it mean for managed futures?


Speak Your Mind


Interested in distributing or reprinting this content? Check out our reprint policy here.


Forex trading, commodity trading, managed futures, and other alternative investments are complex and carry a risk of substantial losses. As such, they are not suitable for all investors.

The entries on this blog are intended to further subscribers understanding, education, and – at times- enjoyment of the world of alternative investments through managed futures, trading systems, and managed forex, and is not intended as investment advice, or an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. Unless distinctly noted otherwise, the data and graphs included herein are intended to be mere examples and exhibits of the topic discussed, are for educational and illustrative purposes only, and do not represent trading in actual accounts. Opinions expressed are that of the author.

*The mention of specific asset class performance (i.e. +3.2%, -4.6%) is based on the noted source index (i.e. Newedge CTA Index, S&P 500 Index, etc.), and investors should take care to understand that any index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship and self reporting biases, and instant history.

The mention of general asset class performance (i.e. managed futures did well, stocks were down, bonds were up) is based on Attain’s direct experience in those asset classes, estimates of performance of dozens of CTAs followed by Attain, and averaging of various indices designed to track said asset classes.

It should be noted that past market performance is not indicative of future market movement.No market data or other information is warranted by Attain Capital Management as to completeness or accuracy, express or implied, and is subject to change without notice.

Managed Futures Disclaimer:

Past Performance is Not Necessarily Indicative of Future Results. The regulations of the CFTC require that prospective clients of a managed futures program (CTA) receive a disclosure document when they are solicited to enter into an agreement whereby the CTA will direct or guide the client’s commodity interest trading and that certain risk factors be highlighted. The disclosure document contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA.

Managed Forex Disclaimer:

Trading in foreign exchange is speculative and may involve the loss of principal; therefore, funds placed under management should be risk capital funds that if lost will not significantly affect one's personal financial well being. They are intended for sophisticated investors and are not suitable for everyone.

Managed forex accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The performance numbers reported for Managed Forex programs on this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Due to the unregulated nature of the foreign currency exchange markets, not all managed forex account advisors are registered with the CFTC.

Unlike Futures Commission Merchants clearing futures trades, Forex brokers are not required to segregate customer funds. Further, there is no equivalent of the Securities Investors Protection Corporation insurance as applicable in the case of securities broker dealers' bankruptcies. Accordingly, in the event of a bankruptcy of a client's Forex broker, the client could be unable to recover any of its assets held by such broker.