The Risk in Hedge Funds as a Portfolio Hedge

Yesterday, one of our favorite bloggers, Josh Brown over at The Reformed Broker, took to the defense of the hedge fund industry after one of our favorite writers Matt Taibbi at Rolling Stone fired a shot across the bow earlier in the week. While Taibbi says hedge funds “suck at investing” because they are all underperforming the S&P this year, Brown argues the point that most people turn to hedge funds for risk-adjusted return (or, at least, they should). It’s not about out-performing a rallying stock market, but (hopefully) earning a respectable return (and a better risk-adjusted return) whether the market goes up or down.

For Brown, while many hedge funds will tout alpha as a major selling point, at the end of the day, most of them simply sacrifice some upside volatility with the intention of avoiding a great deal of downside volatility, too.  Josh goes on to say that there are “some hedge fund managers who are simply beta+leverage” (meaning leveraged bets on the stock market), but that most managers are not chasing Apple or the stock market in general, instead doing other things like “volatility, credit arb, emerging markets, commodities, and on and on”.  (C’mon Josh, you couldn’t give us some managed futures love?)

So we have Taibbi on one side essentially asking why we are paying hedge funds managers millions to just chase the stock market, and Brown on the other saying – hold on, only some chase it, and even those who chase it do so in a way that the results can definitely be something less (in terms of returns and risk) than the stock market.

We’re left thinking they both miss the point, which is a little more nuanced than perhaps either of their audiences want to consider. You see, while hedge funds are doing a lot of different things and not trying to simply beat the market (props Josh Brown), one need only look at 2008 and the severe losses seen by most hedge fund categories to give merit to the idea that many are chasing the stock market (props Matt Taibbi).

The nuanced point is that no matter what hedge funds try and do to provide, as Josh Brown put it,  “an alternative for wealthy investors so that even in tough times, they have someone who can play the short side or find other ways to make money when stocks aren’t rising,” the recent proof in the pudding of 2008 showed that they are still tied to the stock market. Why? It’s complicated, but the quick and easy reasons are because they rely on access to credit just like the companies in the stock market, and that many (even those doing arbitrage or similar) are betting on the success or failure of companies which succeed or fail in sync with the economy (much like the stock market).

So, in our opinion, they are both sort of right, and both sort of wrong.  As you can see below – Brown’s defense is more applicable to some corners of the hedge fund world than others (hint: managed futures), while Taibbi’s argument was more applicable to some categories in 2008 than others (mainly emerging markets and equity neutral).

* Source: Dow Jones Credit Suisse Hedge Fund Indices (Disclaimer: past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.)

At the end of the day, whether hedge funds outperformed stocks this year may be missing the point. While we don’t know what the next crisis will bring, 2008 at least showed us that not all hedge fund categories are made of the same stuff when it comes to crisis period performance – and that’s the time investors are likely looking for hedge funds to do their job.  So, we’ll disagree with Taibbi and say that hedge funds are a better equity play than just investing in the stock market (on a risk adjusted basis), but also realize that when it comes to providing cover in a storm – it’s safe to say that most hedge funds are not the magic bullet investors are looking for.










Trackbacks

  1. […] Hedge funds are no panacea in a bear market.  (Attain Capital) […]

Speak Your Mind

*

Interested in distributing or reprinting this content? Check out our reprint policy here.

DISCLAIMER

Forex trading, commodity trading, managed futures, and other alternative investments are complex and carry a risk of substantial losses. As such, they are not suitable for all investors.

The entries on this blog are intended to further subscribers understanding, education, and – at times- enjoyment of the world of alternative investments through managed futures, trading systems, and managed forex, and is not intended as investment advice, or an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. Unless distinctly noted otherwise, the data and graphs included herein are intended to be mere examples and exhibits of the topic discussed, are for educational and illustrative purposes only, and do not represent trading in actual accounts. Opinions expressed are that of the author.

*The mention of specific asset class performance (i.e. +3.2%, -4.6%) is based on the noted source index (i.e. Newedge CTA Index, S&P 500 Index, etc.), and investors should take care to understand that any index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship and self reporting biases, and instant history.

The mention of general asset class performance (i.e. managed futures did well, stocks were down, bonds were up) is based on Attain’s direct experience in those asset classes, estimates of performance of dozens of CTAs followed by Attain, and averaging of various indices designed to track said asset classes.

It should be noted that past market performance is not indicative of future market movement.No market data or other information is warranted by Attain Capital Management as to completeness or accuracy, express or implied, and is subject to change without notice.

Managed Futures Disclaimer:

Past Performance is Not Necessarily Indicative of Future Results. The regulations of the CFTC require that prospective clients of a managed futures program (CTA) receive a disclosure document when they are solicited to enter into an agreement whereby the CTA will direct or guide the client’s commodity interest trading and that certain risk factors be highlighted. The disclosure document contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA.