Well, not exactly – Cotton and Crude Oil were the 2nd and 4th worst, but nobody really trades OJ and Oats. Anyway… wow, that was an ugly month for most anyone not named the US Treasury Bond, Clarke Capital, or Walmart.
We’re looking at 31 of the 39 financial and commodity markets on finviz.com’s futures page seeing losses in May (all the red over there).
[Please note – finviz does some weird things around contract rolls, which can make their percentage different than what would be found using a continuous contract or the cash/spot market, nonetheless, we feel it is representative. As always, past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.]
The high lowlights:
- 79% of markets down
- 5 markets down over -15%
- 14 markets down over -10%
- 28 markets down over -5%
- Crude Oil down -17.5%
- Euro Currency only down -6%, felt like -25%
- Gold down -6%… safe haven?
We’ll see what June brings (we’re hoping for more of the same given managed futures short positioning).









iGlobal Commodities Panel Disappoints
So, we’re at the iGlobal Alternative Investment Summit watching this panel on commodity exposure… and we’re cringing. You’ve got Martin Kremenstein of Deutsche Bank up there pushing his passive commodity indices. His argument was that active managers in commodities aren’t a great choice, largely because they have lock-up periods and limited transparency.
What?
As a heads up, Mr. Martin, if you access commodities through a traditional trend following program via a managed account, you have daily transparency and liquidity. Try again.
We’d have asked what the point of a long-only fund is when they underperform their underlying commodities pretty badly (and can’t go short when needed), but by the time the panel was winding down, our annoyance was full-blown anger at the poor quality of information. From a proclamation that trend following was dead (what?!) to one panelist guaranteeing only alpha via their product (seriously) to the false assertion that managed futures profits are solely derived from the bond trade (we’ve been over this) to a botched handling of the speculation debate (words fail)… well, it was a hot mess. And we were hot under the collar by the end.
Definitely disappointing. Here’s hoping they get a better panel on this subject in the future.